Study: took a random sample of 2000 tweets over a 2 week period (not that many really). Reviewed to see if Spam, News, Self-Promotional, Pass-along, conversational or pointless babble.

Hypothesis: That Twitter was being used predominantly for self-promotion, pushign a product or service

Conclusion: The most popular tweet type is the ‘pointless babble’, just random stuff about people, with 40.55%. Second was conversational types, with 37.55

They’re surprised, I’m not. Most people exist in a small group, they have <100 followers, many of whom they will know. They don’t tweet too often but there’s a lot of them so it adds up. It’s all between these communities, it’s gossip and passing of time, it’s stating what they are doing to their group. It’s the ambient intimacy thing, bring people closer together.

The number of people who use Twitter with an active purpose has alsways seemed to be to be small. Yes, they’re active and they can drown out others if you have them in your stream, but they are not the majority. For brands, the natural way of acting is not the way that most of the rest of Twitter works!

Pizza Hut Twintern (screenshot from site)

Go to the front page of Pizza Hut and you’ll see this advertisement – they’re looking for a Twintern, someone who is being paid to Twitter for them. I’m pretty sure this is the first time a temp job has been advertised on the front page of Pizza Hut, but this is not just an job ad* it’s a marketing tactic in its own right.

The job itself if pretty straightforward. Attend relevant events and twitter about them. Monitor the service and other social media outlets and report on the activity and sentiment. Plenty of agencies offer this service and enough companies are using it. However, the clever thing is turning the ad into a PR-able event. How many other low-paid short term internships make the New York Times

The Twintern must also play social-media defense, monitoring Twitter for any mentions of the brand and alerting superiors whenever anything negative about the Hut is being said. (Applicants should study last week’s YouTube gross-out video posted by Domino’s employees, which was quickly passed around Twitter, to understand why.) The successful applicant will speak fluent OMG and LOL and correctly use the terms DM (direct message), RT (retweet) and # (hashtag).

The job ad is a little more restrained. They’re taking it far more seriously:

Candidates should be a junior or senior studying for a B.A. or B.S., preferably with specialization in marketing, journalism, communications, public relations or a related course study. Demonstrated knowledge of social media is a must. Selected applicants will be required to submit a portfolio of social media know-how.

They’ve tapped into the social media theme, the Twitter zeitgeist, the Domino’s pizza incident and wrapped it all up into a package that interests reporters. Brilliant PR. So far, so good. But the proof is in the pudding as they say – how are they going to be using this person and what is the long term role of social media within the company?

*it’s an M&S ad job! (Sorry but the Marks and Spencers slogan does stick in the head)

Whist some may trumpet this as a victory of new media over old media, it isn’t. You could call it old media building on new, or old just plain co-opting and taking all the digital stuff for themselves. Via Doc Searls, I see a piece that describes what is happening in some places where brands, companies and celebrities are all playing in the space, from Steven Hodsen

As a result people are beginning to think that social media is nothing more than a round table with corporations, marketers and public relation people deciding on what the conversation is all about. Once more we are finding ourselves being talked to even though it is carefully couched in terms of openness and transparency.

This isn’t what Social Media was meant to be. Just ask people like Doc Searls, or Chris Brogan, or even newcomers like Mark “Rizzn” Hopkins. They’ll be among the first to tell you that Social Media isn’t about the tools or the services. It is about empowering the voice of the individual above that of the companies. It is about the socialization of all types of media in such a way that any individual if they try can be heard like never before.

The plain fact is that neither Kutcher nor CNN could have got this number of followers without old media, either in broadcasting pleas to follow on the news or in the years of mainstream coverage to build a fan base. This is not an either/or situation, this is new media being lassoed and brought into the fold so that it can be used in the same way. 1 million followers is not a ‘social network’, it’s a broadcast channel bigger than many newspapers or TV audiences. It does not empower the voice of the individual above the celebrity or company, it just ties them into more of the same.

Brands too could follow this model; they’ll think if these people can do it, or if Oprah can do it (she is going to do her first public tweet ‘live on TV’ today). But the reality is that brands rarely have anything to offer in the same league as celebrity ‘gossip’ (or an insight into the lives), or news. Broadcast mechanisms won’t necessarily work for them and the exchange value of a follow is not on their side. So I think all the current publicity about Twitter should not go to the marketers head. You still have to think very carefully about why you would use Twitter, how you can use it and what value you are adding to it.

Twitter Partners (screenshot from site)

Update: It seems that NMA just got far too excited about this story and forgot to check with Twitter, who have issued a statement saying there is absolutely no affiliation between them and this new company.

However, the name, branding, and suggestion that Twitter has some kind of equity partnership or an agreement of any kind in place is misleading and wrong. We’ll be working with Peter and his team to clear up this confusion.

Twitter backs first UK partner. Or so says the front page headline on the New Media Age (no links to them..they do not appear to like links). It’s all about a new company called Twitter Partners, which is ‘affiliated’ with Twitter and has apparently signed up some UK companies such as Gorillaz, Paramount, Universal Pictures and Lionsgate.

From the site they are:

building a suite of apps, tools and services to help brands, media companies, and celebrities harness the power of the Twitter ecosystem

So it’s a high profile launch of a branding and social media consultancy agency, which will be building stuff on the Twitter API for companies to help manage their reputation on the service. The only reason I see this being front page news is that it has a lot of interesting people on the ‘About Us‘ page and NMA have got blinded by the word Twitter. There are a lot of tools and companies out there that already do what they do. But with backing and a profile, they are in a position to go out to brands and sooth them, tell them it’s all OK, this Twitter thing is scary but they can help them through it.

Help and outsourcing of experience and skill is the reason why companies employ advertising and marketing agencies in the first place – but is there any reason to have a Twitter agency only? No, not really. Twitter is just one tactic in a whole sea of social media; it needs to be seen as part of the larger communication structure and built into the communications plan. Hiving it off to a separate agency can only lead to difficulties if they don’t work well with the others or if it’s not considered as a customer service route (that’s in towards the company) as well as a marketing route (out towards the customer). Although, if they are focusing on consultancy, maybe that’s one of the messages that Twitter Partners will be saying.

PS: it’s obviously a new company that has not yet got enough Googlejuice to register on search yet. But they’re at least savvy enough to buy the ad

Ad for Twitter Partners on Google (screenshot from site)

Chris had a similar reaction to me, bemoaning the fact Virgin Atlantic forgot to put in a good way for the video to be shared over and above the YouTube copies. He also says in the comments:

Who’d have thought it. Relax gone from banned by the BBC to advertising another British institution.

Zoe did not like it at all, with her reaction and conversation about the ad on Twitter.

Oh Virgin, if only your ad was ironic and post-modern, rather than dated & sexist.

I had a bunch of different reactions on Twitter:

Andresvarela: Customer 15+ years but don’t understand why they’ve done this (so overtly). Was the ‘VirginAtlanicHubbaHubba’ domain taken?

emmapotter: Very cool. Maintains Virgin’s brand positioning as glamorous and fun. Beats its competitors out of the water, as ever

Brodie_san: Asteroids! Awesome! Also, the tallest women I have ever seen. With the biggest aura too!

A completely different reaction from another who focused on the background, not the main images

“A blast from the past!! Our Price records!! Bought many an album there… Ahhh Vinyl!”

Over on Scamp’s blog, you’ve got a whole load of reaction, from it being sexist, to numerous sexist comments about the women in the ad to the absolutely pedantic:

Does anyone know what the record is that the lad in OurPrice store is holding?

Big Country – Steel Town. Released in November 1984 so about 11 months early for a 25th anniversary ad.

Is it good? Is it sexist? It’s definitely noticeable, cutting through a lot of the stuff that’s on in the ad break.

But the key thing? It’s being talked about, it’s polarising and people seem to love it or hate it. The worst thing for a brand is apathy, nobody interested in one way or the other.

They are after 500 people to trial the car for a year. But take a look at the conditions:

• You have to have a garage. Mini will pay for the installation of the box for the car to be plugged into, but if you have older wiring that needs an upgrade, you have to cover that.
• You have to live near the participating dealers and register the car in NY,, NJ or CA.
• You have to pay $850 a month as a lease of the car, which you don’t get to keep. BUT, there are no gas costs (just increased electricity costs, or collision insurance
• You have to bring the car in for scheduled maintenance – but it’s free
• You’re going to have to keep records, offer feedback and potentially have a recording device fitted to the car.

Unlike Gothamist, the cost for driving a new car on a lease seems in keeping to other costs I’ve seen and, as long as you meet the requirements, the benefits seem to be pretty good, especially if you are keen on helping move towards a new kind of car. Although not everyone agrees, as there is definitely a reaction against the cost, with some that as you’re doing them a favour, you should get it for free

It’s interesting that the FAQs address blog rumours:

Contrary to some rumors out there in the blogosphere, we’re not simply giving the vehicles to well-connected celebrities

I can’t find many of those posts, but I do find a lot of posts from people very, very excited about this, such as MPGomatic and this from Tronbikes who talks about the type of questions that are asked, such as your favourite inventor and how you are changing the world.

One of the reasons they chose LA and NY area for the trial is because they’re urban and you’re not necessarily going to be doing long journeys and would return home at the end of them to plug back in. Apparently the USA has no suitable charging stations – I wonder of the ones I see around London would work for the Mini, if there are standards, or if you have to build new ones for different car types.

Image by Rain Rabbit

The Mini site goes into a lot of detail about the offer, laying out all the issues and concerns. They have also got themselves a lot of coverage, both in the specialist car blogs and in the environmental, green blogs, which can only be positive for the brand image. Many of the blogs had been emailed with the news, to get the word out there and attract applicants, a nice use of social media PR.

I wonder how many of the 500 will do an online journal of the trial or if they will be allowed to. Keeping ongoing coverage of the trial going could be essential in driving sales when a production version does come out, a huge body of online information for when some one is doing the research about their next car to buy.